Design For A Battery Farm: Biomineral Synthesis & Refinement Of Lithium, Sodium & Magnesium In A Zoned Clay Matrix
By Sarah Ikerd, Studio Shangri-La Multimedia, July 2025
Sarah.ikerd@studio-shangri-la.com
www.studio-shangri-la.com; https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sarah-Ikerd
Figure 1: Basic Layout of the Zoned Clay Matrix
Abstract
In an era of escalating demand for critical minerals, this paper proposes a significant paradigm shift: A biogeologic approach to mineral synthesis that follows the Earth’s natural rock cycle, augmented by microbial catalysts and regenerative design. Rather than extracting minerals prematurely—often at great ecological and human cost, this case study of biosynthetic lithium, sodium and magnesium production explores how lithogenic processes can be accelerated and guided through microbial interventions, enabling the formation of useful materials guided by the templates of natural planetary rhythms. (1)
In using battery materials lithium, sodium and magnesium as focal elements, this multitiered clay matrix design examines the feasibility of synthesizing and refining battery grade minerals by mimicking sedimentary and hydrothermal pathways. This is accelerated by microbial agents capable of selective ion transport, carbonate precipitation, and clay formation. This approach reframes lithium not as a scarcity of extractive mining, but as a mineral that could be cultivated through modular, surface-compatible, biologically informed process. In other words, by non-toxic mineral farming. For the long term, lithium cultivation is not recommended. (2) (3)
The Earth’s difficulty in yielding certain minerals and their toxicity may reflect a natural boundary, an ecological signal that some substances are not yet ready for use. By respecting these boundaries of the rock cycle, biogeologic synthesis offers a new non-extractive, regenerative ethic for infrastructure, energy, and material science: one that is sustainable, and quite symbiotic. The clay matrix is the probable equivalent of building the microbes luxury apartment communities with all you can eat buffets.
Figure 2: Sedimentation – Wikipedia
Tri-Zone Matrix Architecture
This system employs a modular, zoned matrix composed of three horizontally layered clay habitats, each optimized for microbial synthesis of a specific ion—sodium, lithium, or magnesium. The sodium zone integrates bentonite for hydrated porosity and halotolerant (salt tolerant) biofilms; the lithium zone blends montmorillonite and vermiculite for cation exchange and sulfide templating; and the magnesium zone combines vermiculite with biochar-infused clay, facilitating buffered precipitation and organic scaffolding. (4) (5)
The matrix functions as a surface-compatible, multi-ion refinement complex that is biologically moderated, non-extractive, and aligned with natural sedimentary logic. The three sections model mimics ecological zoning such as that which occurs at different levels, from riparian corridors, to cave systems, or to elementomes. This is a biomimicry of sedimentary environments, that often exhibit repeated lamellae, and strata of microbes and clay. (6) (7)
Figure 3: Montmorillonite – images from Wikipedia (edited)
Overview Of The 6 Layers
The microbes will flourish in this bio-similar habitat, since biofilms form naturally when there’s layering and buffered interfaces. For ionic optimization, having the spaced synthesis zones reduces saturation and supports multi-step mineral formation. Furthermore, the modularity is easy to keep intact and the stack is also tunable per ion. For instance, Magnesium (Mg) might need more acidic interlayers, Lithium (Li) a tighter spacing, or Sodium (Na) more hydration. (8)
Top Layer: Aerobic Microbial Zone
The top layer is an aerobic or oxygen rich surface zone that is the microbial interface, with light porosity where gas exchange occurs, and it also protects from desiccation.
Lamellae Spacer 1: Microbial Channels (throughout)
Horizontal lamella allow diffusion & microbial circulation. These soft clay interlayers protect biofilms. Lamellae prevent compaction, distribute oxygen, and set the staging areas.
Synthesis Layer 1:
The first ionic templating site with ion-specific clay and specialized microbes initiate templating, precipitation and stabilization. The environment is slightly alkaline, which is optimal for Li⁺, Na⁺, Mg²⁺ templating. (9)
Lamellae Spacer 2:
Lamellae provide structural reset and hydration balance. They maintain porosity and enable interlayer microbial migration.
Synthesis Layer 2:
The next synthesis layer is for secondary templating & refinement. Further ion capture occurs, and this layered output may improve purity for refinement. (10)
Reservoir Layer:
The passive bottom layer is the byproduct collection and anaerobe zone. It is a waste sink, for possible post-treatment or soil reentry.
Figure 4: Sodium, Lithium, Magnesium – images from Wikipedia (edited)
The Matrix Habitat:
Top Layer, Aerobic Microbial Zone
• Montmorillonite-Bentonite blend
• Oxygen-rich environment
• Hosts lithium, sodium microbes
- Light porosity for gas exchange
A bentonite/montmorillonite blend is selected for the top layer across all zones to balance hydration stability, microbial adhesion, and surface ion buffering. Pure bentonite offers excellent swelling and cation exchange, and the blended structure maintains porosity and surface coherence without over saturation—providing an optimal aerobic habitat and gentle ionic interface for halotolerant, sulfide-compatible, and buffered microbial communities alike. (11) (12)
Middle Layer, Ion Exchange Zone:
• Montmorillonite and vermiculite sheets
• Slightly alkaline; optimal for Li⁺, Na⁺, Mg²⁺ templating
- Microbial templating, mineral stabilization
Microbial Comfort Channels (throughout):
• Horizontal lamella allow diffusion & communication
- Soft clay interlayers protect biofilms
- Montmorillonite
Bottom Layer, Passive Reservoir:
• Captures byproducts & unrefined ions
• Potential anaerobic microbial zone
- Reusable as soil amendment or biosensor
Each reservoir layer serves as a passive collection zone for refined mineral compounds and microbial byproducts. In the sodium zone, it captures excess Na⁺ and halotolerant biosignatures for reuse or biochemical sensing/monitoring. In the lithium zone, it buffers residual Li⁺ compounds and supports secondary microbial cycling. In the magnesium zone, it stabilizes struvite or MgO precipitates, and byproducts can be repurposed for soil amendment/fertilizer or storage. Across all zones, the reservoir preserves ecological fidelity while enabling controlled harvesting of bio-refined minerals. (13)
Figure 5: Biochar & Struvite – images from Wikimedia (edited)
Design By Zone (Lithium / Sodium / Magnesium)
Sodium Zone: Halo-tolerant Refinement (Na⁺)
• Top Aerobic Layer
• Lamellae Spacer 1
• Synthesis Layer 1 (Na⁺ templating)
• Lamellae Spacer 2
• Synthesis Layer 2
• Reservoir Layer (byproducts and microbial reuse)
Both synthesis layers in the sodium zone utilize bentonite clay, selected for high montmorillonite content, swelling capacity, and strong affinity for Na⁺ ions. The hydrated, porous structure creates an ideal environment for halotolerant microbes, enabling efficient sodium templating and sustained biofilm activity across both layers.
The reservoir layer in the sodium zone captures residual Na⁺ ions and halotolerant microbial metabolites. Byproducts may include sodium hydroxide (NaOH), sodium carbonate (Na₂CO₃), and trace biosignals such as osmolytes, or extracellular polymers. (14) These compounds reflect successful microbial templating and salt-tolerant metabolic activity. Sodium Hydroxide, though volatile, indicates pH modulation, while mild Sodium Carbonate may form through microbial respiration or buffering. (15) (16)
While sodium hydroxide may form in trace amounts as a microbial byproduct, the matrix design integrates buffering substrates—such as bentonite clay and vermiculite—to absorb alkalinity and prevent corrosive accumulation. Halo-tolerant microbes like Halomonas elongata, also contribute to localized pH regulation through osmolyte production and ion exchange. Together, these mechanisms preserve surface compatibility and ensure that any sodium derivatives remain ecologically safe and non-toxic. (17) (18)
Lithium Zone: Sulfide-Compatible Refinement (Li⁺)
• Top Aerobic Layer
• Lamellae Spacer 1
• Synthesis Layer 1 (Li⁺ templating)
• Lamellae Spacer 2
• Synthesis Layer 2
• Reservoir Layer (for biosensor output or reentry)
Each lithium zone incorporates two synthesis layers composed of a montmorillonite and vermiculite blend. The upper layer initiates Li⁺ templating through high cation exchange and microbial adhesion, while the lower layer provides buffered conditions for secondary mineral formation and refinement. This dual-layer structure enhances microbial throughput and supports the sequential capture of lithium compounds with ecological fidelity. (19)
The reservoir layer in the lithium zone captures downstream byproducts of microbial refinement, including residual Li⁺ ions, lithium hydroxide, and lithium sulfide. These compounds reflect successful microbial templating and metabolic activity, with LiOH indicating effective pH modulation and Li₂S suggesting sulfide-rich anaerobic cycling. Chemical or molecular traces may also accumulate, offering great potential for reuse. Together, these outputs mark the completion of refinement and better preserving ecological fidelity within the lithium habitat. (20)
Magnesium Zone: Buffered Clay Habitat (Mg²⁺)
• Top Aerobic or Buffered Layer
• Lamellae Spacer 1
• Synthesis Layer 1 (Mg²⁺ templating)
• Lamellae Spacer 2
• Synthesis Layer 2
• Reservoir Layer (useful Struvite or Magnesium Oxide MgO output)
Both synthesis layers in the magnesium zone utilize a blend of vermiculite and biochar. Vermiculite provides high cation exchange capacity and interlayer hydration, supporting Mg²⁺ adsorption and microbial mobility. Biochar enhances porosity, buffers pH, and offers additional surface area for Struvite, a potential fertilizer, or MgO formation. Together, the layers create a breathable, buffered habitat for magnesium-templating microbes such as Proteus mirabilis and Bacillus subtilis, enabling efficient mineral refinement with ecological fidelity. (21)
Figure 6: Ghost Calcite, example of lamellar sedimentation – photo by the author
Sheet-Like Lamellae Spacers
Unlike other designs for clay synthesis, this matrix adds microbes and keeps the geometry horizontal, breathable, and microbe-hospitable. The layered mineral logic allows for naturally encouraged refinement of lithium, sodium, and magnesium. Inspired by nature, it mimics how natural clays (like kaolinite and mica) form layered stacks from interstitial water and ion flow.
Lamellae are mechanically stable; easy to press, mold, or print using common materials with no need for nanofabrication. For microbial comfort, they offer wide surface area for biofilm formation and templating, with no pressure points or harsh vertical compression.
The modularity and scalability ensure that these layers can be added or adjusted based on synthesis needs (such as here lithium, sodium, magnesium), making it versatile without complexity.
Montmorillonite clay is selected as the lamellae spacer material across all matrix zones due to its layered structure, exceptional cation exchange capacity, and microbial compatibility. As a naturally occurring, hydrated silicate, it facilitates horizontal flow, supports microbial adhesion, and maintains stable moisture levels—making it an ideal neutral corridor between synthesis layers without interfering with ion-specific templating. (22)
Figure 7: Atacama, Chile – Wikipedia
The Specialized Microbes
Starting with the remarkable Pseudomonas rhodesiae, it tolerates extraordinary lithium concentrations, and also converts lithium salts into lithium sulfide, using nothing more than cysteine and its own metabolism. The positive implications for current industry here are tremendous.
Originally isolated from natural mineral waters, especially in lithium-rich environments like the Atacama salt flats, it belongs to the P. fluorescens group, known for thriving in moist, mineral-rich, and slightly alkaline conditions. To perform this biomineralization of lithium sulfide, P. rhodesiae needs lithium salts (lithium chloride or lithium sulfate in solution). Also listed here are the matched microbes for Sodium and Magnesium, which offer less invasive and more earth-friendly ethical alternatives for battery production. (23)
Top Microbe for Sodium (Na⁺): Halomonas elongata
– Thrives in saline environments and perfect for sodium chloride inputs.
– Naturally regulates sodium ion transport and osmotic balance.
– Produces Ectoine, a compatible solute that stabilizes biofilms.
– It’s matrix synergy works beautifully in hydrated clay layers.
– It can cohabitate with lithium-templating microbes like P. rhodesiae. (24)
Top Microbe for Lithium (Li⁺): Pseudomonas rhodesiae
– Tolerates extremely high lithium concentrations, up to 700 mM.
- Produces Hydrogen Sulfide in the presence of Cysteine, an amino acid that helps the bacterium produce H₂S, which reacts with lithium to form Li₂S nanoparticles.
– Moderate temperature, between 20–30°C, and typical of mesophilic bacteria.
– P. rhodesiae prefers aerobic/oxygen-rich environments.
– Neutral to slightly alkaline pH, which is ideal for sulfide production and nanoparticle formation.
Top Microbe for Magnesium (Mg²⁺): Proteus mirabilis
– Ideal for its demonstrated ability to synthesize magnesium oxide nanoparticles extracellularly
– Active in neutral pH (~7), aligning with the matrix’s middle zone.
– Produces enzymes that reduce Mg²⁺ and stabilize mineral output.
– Compatible with montmorillonite and vermiculite layers.
- Can co-refine magnesium alongside lithium and sodium without competitive inhibition. (25)
Figure 8: The Microbes – images from Wikipedia (edited)
Source Materials & Interactions
Lithium (Li⁺): Lithium chloride can come from surface brines, which is high energy density for mainstream adoption. P. rhodesiae or L. sphaericus refine this into LiOH or Li₂S, and there is a strong cation exchange via montmorillonite & vermiculite. (26)
Sodium (Na⁺): This is readily available as sodium chloride (NaCl), which is abundant, non-toxic, and low-cost. The halo-tolerant microbes can template Na-based compounds and are compatible with the bentonite and clay hydration layers.
Magnesium (Mg²⁺): Magnesium sulfate or carbonate minerals are high charge density and stable chemistry. Microbes mediate Mg mineralization (e.g. struvite) while the matrix buffers pH and enables ion accommodation. (27)
By enabling microbial synthesis of lithium alongside sodium and magnesium within the same clay matrix, this design offers an adaptable, modular refinement path—supporting both current demand and more importantly next-generation energy systems. The intent is to open another door to regenerative mineral economy with a concept that’s scaleable.
Suggested Size For Lab-Scale Prototype
The goal starting parameters for a convincing yield would have to show effective surface-compatible synthesis of Li⁺, Na⁺, and Mg²⁺ at meaningful volume for lab validation or pilot demonstration. These are conservative estimates based on microbial throughput, ion diffusion rates, and realistic surface-compatible yields; scaling up is modular, expanding each layered zone independently:
Matrix footprint: 45 cm × 15 cm × 5 cm
Total yield: 0.5–1.0 g/day across three elements
Zone < Dimensions < Volume < Clay Mass (wet) < Target Output
Sodium: ~15 × 15 × 5 cm, ~1.1 L, ~1.2 kg, ~300–500 mg Na per day
Lithium: ~15 × 15 × 5 cm, ~1.1 L, ~1.3 kg, ~50–150 mg
Magnesium: ~15 × 15 × 5 cm, ~1.1 L, ~1.1 kg, ~150–300 mg
Even this demonstration scale could provide real-world relevance without extractive pressure. It also provides enough material for spectroscopy, structural analysis and perhaps even battery prototype testing. (28)
Figure 9: Microsoft Copilot AI visualization of the Biorefinery
Field-Ready Biorefinery Model
The tri-zone clay matrix for refining lithium, sodium, and magnesium is very well suited for distributed deployment as a field-scale biorefinery. (29) For containment, a cellulose bioplastic is recommended for each matrix unit. (30) Here’s how it can translate to larger scale:
Modular Arrays
– Each unit is ~45 × 15 × 5 cm and self-contained.
– Arrays of 10–100 units can be deployed in greenhouses, rooftops and more.
– Units are stackable or spreadable, depending on terrain and climate.
Surface-Compatible Operation
– No excavation, no toxic solvents, no extractive pressure.
– Uses ambient hydration, passive flow, and microbial inoculation.
– Can be powered by solar-heated water, rain-fed systems or gravity-fed brine inputs.
Microbial Refinement Zones
– Sodium zone: Halomonas elongata in bentonite-rich lamellae.
– Lithium zone: P. rhodesiae and L. sphaericus in montmorillonite/vermiculite blend.
– Magnesium zone: Proteus mirabilis and B. subtilis in biochar-infused vermiculite. (31)
Possible Large Scale Yield Of Minerals
Based on the above information, a 100-unit array could produce ~50–100 g/day of refined ion compounds. That is enough for battery prototyping, material testing, or regional supply chains. Lithium is presented here, since it has been an industry standard. However, sodium and magnesium based batteries are also here presented as possibly more non toxic and ethical alternatives, in addition to others. (32)
Conclusion
Guided by microbial intelligence, this design harnesses the innate capability of Earth’s earliest engineers. With future directions that could even include terraforming, this process-based design represents a biorefinery that is a living mineral farm. It’s deployable, ethical, and revolutionary — an architecture of stewardship and synthesis. This layered clay matrix, guided by specialized microbes, refines sodium, lithium, and magnesium with ecological fidelity and it also nourishes the soil through beneficial byproducts like struvite and magnesium oxide, returning value to the Earth. Such symbiotic logic could reshape mineral sourcing for good. After all, nature is working for us and not against us, and we can do the same.
References
1. Rudko, G. (2022). Scientific and Methodological Foundations of Biogeology. In: Chenchouni, H., et al.New Prospects in Environmental Geosciences and Hydrogeosciences. CAJG 2019. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72543-3_21
2. Biemolt J, Jungbacker P, van Teijlingen T, Yan N, Rothenberg G. Beyond Lithium-Based Batteries. Materials (Basel). 2020 Jan 16;13(2):425. doi: 10.3390/ma13020425. PMID: 31963257; PMCID: PMC7013668.
3. Marwa Eltarahony, Daniel Jestrzemski, Mohamed A. Hassan,
A comprehensive review of recent advancements in microbial-induced mineralization: biosynthesis and mechanism, with potential implementation in various environmental, engineering, and medical sectors,
Science of The Total Environment, Volume 978, 2025, 179426, ISSN 0048-9697, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179426.
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725010630)
4. Behnsen, J., and D. R. Faulkner (2013), Permeability and frictional strength of cation-exchanged montmorillonite, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 118, 2788–2798, doi:10.1002/jgrb.50226.
5. Emily Millman, Anamika Chatterjee, Kimberly M. Parker, Jeffrey G. Catalano, Cation exchange to montmorillonite induces selective adsorption of amino acids, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Volume 372, 2024,
Pages 181-195, ISSN 0016-7037, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2024.02.020. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016703724001029)
6. Di Zhang, Chun-Hui Zhou, Chun-Xiang Lin, Dong-Shen Tong, Wei-Hua Yu, Synthesis of clay minerals, Applied Clay Science, Volume 50, Issue 1,
2010, Pages 1-11, ISSN 0169-1317, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2010.06.019. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016913171000181X)
7. Kemmling, A., Kämper, M., Flies, C. et al. Biofilms and extracellular matrices on geomaterials. Env Geol46, 429–435 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-004-1044-x
8. Microbes as Structural Templates in Biofabrication: Study of Surface Chemistry and Applications. Muhammad Wajid Ullah, Zhijun Shi, Xudian Shi, Di Zeng, Sixiang Li, and Guang Yang. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2017 5 (12), 11163-11175, DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02765.
9. Debnath, A., Mitra, S., Ghosh, S. et al. Understanding microbial biomineralization at the molecular level: recent advances. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 40, 320 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-024-04132-6
10. Gui Li Li, Chun Hui Zhou, Saverio Fiore, Wei Hua Yu,
Interactions between microorganisms and clay minerals: New insights and broader applications, Applied Clay Science, Volume 177, 2019, Pages 91-113, ISSN 0169-1317, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2019.04.025.
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169131719301565)
11. Zhang, C., Zhou, K., Wang, Z. et al. Montmorillonite as an “accelerator” for the microbial carbon pump during artificial biocrust construction. Plant Soil (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-025-07256-2
12. Endo, M., & Sato, H. (2024). Swelling Stress of Bentonite: Thermodynamics of Interlayer Water in K-Montmorillonite in Consideration of Alteration. Minerals, 14(4), 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14040430
13. Bamdad, H., Papari, S., Lazarovits, G., & Berruti, F. (2022). Soil amendments for sustainable agriculture: Microbial organic fertilizers. Soil Use and Management, 38, 94–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12762
14. Mojtabavi S, Samadi N, Faramarzi MA. Osmolyte-Induced Folding and Stability of Proteins: Concepts and Characterization. Iran J Pharm Res. 2019 Fall;18(Suppl1):13-30. doi: 10.22037/ijpr.2020.112621.13857. PMID: 32802087; PMCID: PMC7393045.
15. Ahmadi, Majid & Seyedina, Seyed. (2019). Investigation of NaOH Properties, Production and Sale Mark in the world. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337495070_Investigation_of_NaOH_Properties_Production_and_Sale_Mark_in_the_world
16. Brooke D, Movahed N, Bothner B. Universal buffers for use in biochemistry and biophysical experiments. AIMS Biophys. 2015;2(3):336-342. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.3.336. Epub 2015 Aug 14. PMID: 35340547; PMCID: PMC8956001.
17. Robles-Fernández, A., Areias, C., Daffonchio, D., Vahrenkamp, V. C., & Sánchez-Román, M. (2022). The Role of Microorganisms in the Nucleation of Carbonates, Environmental Implications and Applications. Minerals, 12(12), 1562. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12121562
18. Indrasumunar A, Gresshoff PM. Vermiculite’s strong buffer capacity renders it unsuitable for studies of acidity on soybean (Glycine max L.) nodulation and growth. BMC Res Notes. 2013 Nov 14;6:465. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-465. PMID: 24229409; PMCID: PMC3835622.
19. Xiaojuan Lu, Mingyang Duan, Jing Li,
Increase of the ionic conductivity of perovskite-type lithium-ion conductor by bacterial cellulose templating, Ceramics International, Volume 49, Issue 15,
2023, Pages 24981-24988, ISSN 0272-8842, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.05.027. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272884223012737)
20. Junhyeong- Seo, Thang Toan Vu, Seungu- Cho, Jieun- Cha, Yeongeun- Choi, Hojung- Kim, Daesung- Song. Techno-economic evaluation of Lithium hydroxide recovery from waste battery effluent: Process design and scalability assessment,
Journal of Energy Storage, Volume 125, 2025, 117002, ISSN 2352-152X,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2025.117002.(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X25017153)
21. Ma, Z., Zheng, D., Liang, B. et al. Effect of vermiculite-modified biochar on carbon sequestration potential, mercury adsorption stability, and economics. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 15, 9513–9529 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-024-05774-0
22. Wenbo Wang, Yunliang Zhao, Licai Chen, Lingjie Zhang, Tong Wen, Zhenlei Wang, Tingting Zhang. Two-dimensional montmorillonite membranes with controllable sub-nanochannel for precise separation of mono/divalent cations.
Chemical Engineering Journal, Volume 500, 2024, 156801, ISSN 1385-8947,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.156801. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1385894724082925)
23. Bruna, N., Galliani, E., Oyarzún, P. et al. Biomineralization of lithium nanoparticles by Li-resistant Pseudomonas rodhesiae isolated from the Atacama salt flat. Biol Res 55, 12 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-022-00382-6
24. Hobmeier Karina , Goëss Marie C. , Sehr Christiana , Schwaminger Sebastian , Berensmeier Sonja , Kremling Andreas , Kunte Hans Jörg , Pflüger-Grau Katharina , Marin-Sanguino Alberto. Anaplerotic Pathways in Halomonas elongata: The Role of the Sodium Gradient. Frontiers in Microbiology, Volume 11, 2020. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2020.561800. DOI=10.3389/fmicb.2020.561800. ISSN=1664-302X.
25. Iqtedar, M., Arooj, S., Shahzad, A. et al. Proteus mirabilis—Mediated Green Synthesis of Magnesium Nanoparticles: Optimization and Their Antimicrobial Activity. Biol Bull Russ Acad Sci 51, 1605–1613 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359024608449
26. Microbial Mineralization with Lysinibacillus sphaericus for Selective Lithium Nanoparticle Extraction. Toriana N. Vigil, Grayson C. Johnson, Sarah G. Jacob, Leah C. Spangler, and Bryan W. Berger. Environmental Science & Technology 2024 58 (38), 16915-16921. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c06540.
27. Cho, T., & Kim, M. J. (2018). Synthesis of magnesium sulfate from seawater using alkaline industrial wastes, sulfuric acid, and organic solvents. Separation Science and Technology, 54(16), 2749–2757. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2018.1553982
28. Cleaver, J. (2023, October 26). *Rules of thumb: Scale-up*. The Chemical Engineer. https://www.thechemicalengineer.com/features/rules-of-thumb-scale-up/
29. Calvo-Flores Francisco G., Martin-Martinez Francisco J. Biorefineries: Achievements and challenges for a bio-based economy. Frontiers in Chemistry, Volume 10 – 2022, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/chemistry/articles/10.3389/fchem.2022.973417, DOI=10.3389/fchem.2022.973417, ISSN=2296-2646.
30. Nigam, S., Das, A.K., Matkawala, F. et al. An insight overview of bioplastics produced from cellulose extracted from plant material, its applications and degradation. Environmental Sustainability 5, 423–441 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-022-00248-3
31. Guo, T., & Herman, J. K. (2023). *Magnesium modulates Bacillus subtilis cell division frequency*. *Journal of Bacteriology, 205*(1), e00375-22. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00375-22
32. F. N. Crespilho, C. M. Costa, S. Lanceros-Méndez, ChemElectroChem 2025, 12, e202400530. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202400530